If they prove that I was wrong, then I'll go by what they say.
如果他们证明我错了,那么我就会照他们说的去做。
So the personality theory, follow the personality, is wrong if we say neither of these guys is Napoleon.
所以人格理论所遵循的人格特性,是错误的,如果我们说两者都不是拿破仑。
In the same way as with a human language, if we get the grammar wrong and say typed '=LET 2 X' the computer wouldn't know what to do, the information is there but the grammar is wonky.
我们用自然语言交谈,如果语法错误,我们就不得其意;类似地,如果我们在计算机中键入“= LET 2 X”,计算机也不知道该做什么。 信息在那里,可惜语法错了。
Why not then say,similarly,even though my body's still alive, nothing wrong about removing the heart if the person is dead.
这样为什么不能说,即使肉体依然生存,但是个人已经死亡时摘除心脏是可以的。
I'm wondering if you can say the wrong things to them --to infants based on what you were saying before.
我想问,根据你刚才所讲的,是否能够对婴儿说些错误的表达
So your TA might take a minute, so be patient with them if they see your structure and they say oh, no, no, no, no that's wrong, that's terrible, and they don't immediately know why.
因此助教可能需要一点时间,如果他们看到你画的路易斯结构以后说,噢,不,不,不,不,这是错的,错得离谱,而他们却不能立刻说出错在哪。
应用推荐