It will be, I think, much like other constitutional rights cases and may come down to a matter of interpretation of individual rights as defined by the high court.
He reckons that privatisation, which is a transfer of property rights, is not only meaningless but positively counter-productive in a system that has not yet defined these rights adequately.
Standard economic models predict that in the absence of clearly defined property rights, such common resources will be overexploited, with individuals acting without regard for the effects of their actions on the overall pool.