...net;完全可验证性;不可胁迫性 [gap=1191]keywords:electronic voting; mix-net; universal verifiability; receipt-freeness ...
基于14个网页-相关网页
Therefore, for an electronic voting to be fully democratic there is a need for security mechanisms that will assure a voter neither obtains nor is able to construct a receipt proving the content of his vote, say receipt-freeness.
一个真正民主的电子投票协议必须能够防止这类问题,所以必须保证投票人既不能获得,也不能设法构造一个选票收据,用于向其他人证明他提交了某一特定的选票,即要保证投票协议的“无收据性”。
参考来源 - 无收据的安全电子投票协议研究Receipt-freeness is a security property to defend against such threats. This property essentially means that voters should not be able to prove to an adversary that she chooses a particular candidate.
为了应对这两种攻击行为,选举协议必须具有无收据属性,无收据性意味着投票人不能向攻击者证明他选择了哪一个候选人。
参考来源 - 电子选举中的安全技术研究·2,447,543篇论文数据,部分数据来源于NoteExpress
应用推荐