In specific reply to your assertion the author of this piece did not offer any evidence refuting the LNT hypothesis, I disagree, he specifically cited factual, observed experience of no increased cancer risk in areas where normal and persistent background radiation levels are well above levels the LNT hypothesis would assert must have statistically significant higher cancer risk.
FORBES: Nuclear Scientist Responds To Critics Of His Belief That Fukushima Refugees Are Victims Of Fear, Not Radiation