So this validates de Broglie and it also validates the whole concept of wave-particle duality.

这就证实了德布罗意的观点,也证实了,波粒二象性的原理。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

If de Broglie is correct, we could then model the electron in its orbit not moving as a particle, but let's model it as a wave.

如果德布罗意是对的，那么我们可以在电子轨道中建立电子模型,不是像粒子一样运动，而是像波一样运动。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

So you're basically having a wave equation for a particle, and for our purposes we're talking about a very particular particle. What we're interested in is the electron.

所以你们主要有,一个粒子的波动方程，我们的目的是考虑一个特殊的粒子,我们感兴趣的是电子。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

By everything, what I mean is every possible configuration of that particle (wave) and the surround matter is expressed, perhaps simultaneously, perhaps in series.

FORBES: Post-Singularity Roundup

In particle physics, sound-bite explanations are much harder: wave-particle duality, quantum mechanics, general relativity and string theory make good mathematical sense, or so I am told, but they generally defy translation into English.

WSJ: Matt Ridley on the Higgs Boson | Mind & Matter

This shows that light is actually neither just a particle nor just a wave, but rather both simultaneously.

ECONOMIST: 100 years of Einstein