It might be wrong to expect that our world would be saved at one stroke with some miraculous technology.
指望一些神奇的技术能一下子拯救我们的世界,这可能是错误的。
They thought they understood reality well, and that the future would just be one of ever more precise measurements. They could not have been more wrong.
他们认为自己已经很好的理解了现实世界,而未来世界不过是将其测量的更加精确而已,然而,他们大错特错了。
It would be better if the right thread were on core 1, but we seem to be stuck with taking a chance that the wrong one ends up on core 1, and that's very bad, leaving cores 0 and 2 as the safe choice.
如果正确的线程位于核心1上将会更好,但是也可能会遇到错误线程正好位于核心1上的情况,这就会非常糟糕。保留核心0和2为安全选项。
It would definitely be wrong if we were doing this because little sanity check if you just got the single one it means what instead?
如果我们这样做就是错误的,一个小检查,如果你用单个“=“,是什么意思?
应用推荐