The result is" the judge does not apply the rule when he has no moral-based certainty about the nonexistence of main facts or when he has no moral-based certainty about the existence and nonexistence of ther main facts".
结果是“法官对主要事实不存在抱有确信,以及就主要事实存否无法达到确信之时均不适用该法规”,并以此作为解决真伪不明的策略,成为了支撑整个罗森贝克规范说的动脉。
参考来源 - 民事诉讼证明标准之基础理论研究·2,447,543篇论文数据,部分数据来源于NoteExpress
应用推荐