The statement they reference about liquid supplements being more bioavailable first appeared in the PDR under a listing for a specific nutritional supplement product.
他们所参考的有关液状补充品具有较高的生体利用率陈述，一开始是出现在PDR手册里的”特定营养补充品”的项目里。
Existing examples include Musashi whey-protein supplements and PowerBar snacks for athletes; Sondalis and Nutren Glytrol liquid diets for diabetics; and Optifast powders and shakes for dieters.
目前这类食品包括Musashi乳清蛋白补充剂、运动员专用PowerBar点心、糖尿病人专用的Sondalis 和 Nutren Glytrol流食以及为节食人群设计的Optifast牌奶粉和奶昔。
If liquid or spray supplements are so much better, why are they rarely, if ever, used in published scientific research?
假如液体或喷雾形式的补充是这么的好，为什么这么少被用在已发表的科学研究上呢？
应用推荐