It's now a tool, it's anoption that a president should have available to deal with weapons of mass destruction, but it is anoption only after diplomacy has failed, which it now emphasizes at the undertake, only after we have tried concerted action together with our allies to resolve these issues peacefully.
"It's not anoption in my view, we've taken a look at it clearly and we do take every suggestion seriously but it does seem like it's not feasible, " said Mr Toth.
