The death of Ivan is presented by Tolstoy to be an "individual death" in a sense of modernity.
在托尔斯泰笔下,伊凡的“死”被展现为颇有现代感的“个人之死”。
Their similar childhoods, military lives and the social backgrounds are indispensable for the forming of their individual death consciousness.
他们相似的个人死亡意识与他们在童年和青年时期极为相似的人生经历、社会背景和文化环境是分不开的。
Additionally, each individual death knight ability has a fairly low impact on its own, making it feel like most of the death knight's attacks are weak.
此外,每个人的死亡骑士有能力对自己相当低的影响,使其攻击感觉就像大部分的死亡骑士薄弱。
And here I want to distinguish between the individual question about the inevitability of death, and the universal question.
在这里我要区分,死亡必然性的个人性,以及普遍性。
So perhaps in terms of the individual badness of death that's a wash.
所以也许死亡的坏处可忽略不计了。
They are mere personifications of abstract ideas, and it's not at all clear that Sin and her son, Death, exist as individual entities in the same way, or on the same plane, that Satan does, for example, or Beelzebub.
他们仅仅是将抽象的思想拟人化的结果,但我们不清楚的是罪恶之神和她的儿子死神,以同样的方式或在同一个星球作为独立的个体存在,例如撒旦或者苍蝇王比尔泽布也是这样。
应用推荐