There is much disagreement between Hobbes and Locke regarding power. Locke concluded that, for the most part, humans are capable of discerning between what is lawful and what isn't and therefore can resolve conflicts without a force above them. He believed that the government should only remain in power if it has the permission of those it governs. Hobbes thought that, in a state of nature, people cannot handle power and are condemned to endless violent conflict. Hence, they can only live in peace together by subjection to the absolute power of a common master. This ideal is directly related to “War of the Buttons” and “Lord of the flies”. In both scenarios, the children rely on the ideals of Hobbes, in the sense that they forfeit their individual power to a common master for the greater good.
基于1个网页-相关网页
No! Descartes thought that mind whose essence is thinking is made of immaterial substance but Hobbes would have non of that.
不是，笛卡尔认为思维的精髓,在于思考，是非物质的,但是霍布斯却不这么认为。
It's the key argument against Hobbes, that matter cannot give rise to thought.
这是反对霍布斯的主要观点，即物质不能产生思想。
But Hobbes was a compatibilist, he thought that free will and compatible.
但是霍布斯是一位兼容并包主义者，他认为自由意志是可以融会贯通的。
应用推荐