The point, she says, isn't that judges actually use foreign decisions as precedent (er, well, of course they don't), but that they open their minds to the intellectual force of their foreign counterparts.
They were, of course, members of governments that, er, announced policies in the media rather than to the House on an almost daily basis - and the current ministers they now condemn used to condemn them, just as righteously for doing what they, themselves, do now.