Conclusions Anti-atrial fibrillation pacemaker in the treatment of PAF is superior than conventional DDD pacing and may be important complementation of traditional methods .
结论抗房颤起搏器治疗阵发房颤优于普通DDD起搏器,似可作为传统治疗方法的重要补充。
Conclusion: Cardiac permanent pacing can improve heart function of patients with chronic arrhythmia, DDD and AAI modes were better than VVI mode.
结论:心脏永久起搏能有效改善缓慢心律失常患者的心功能,DDD及AAI模式优于VVI模式。
Compared to DDD mode, adopting DDDR and VVIR pacing modes, cardiovascular symptoms and quality of life of 51 SSS patients were significantly improved.
病窦综合征病人,与DDD模式相比,DDDR、VVIR起搏模式时,心血管症状和生活质量显著改善;
应用推荐