欧盟还将逐步减少传统的补贴和生产配额，最终取消那种让农场主为了防止生产过剩而让10%的土地休耕的做法。
It would also move away from traditional subsidies and production quotas - and eventually scrap a practice of making farmers set aside 10 percent of their land due to overproduction.
由此看来，煤油补贴的做法至少可称得上是明智稳健，但同样也是耗资巨大。
Thus a kerosene subsidy can at least claim to be progressive as well as expensive.
你在欧洲市场的运作也十分成功。欧洲大量补贴清洁能源和对燃油征收重税的做法是一个正确的途径吗？
You operate in Europe very profitably. Do you feel that European regulations-a lot more subsidies for clean energy, higher taxes on gasoline-are the right approach?
应用推荐