令人惊讶的是，这样的问题在标准的历史中很少受到关注，在标准的历史中欧洲探险家通常是英雄，有时是恶棍。

Such questions have received surprisingly little attention in standard histories, where European explorers are usually the heroes, sometimes the villains.

youdao

然而，这种历史分期最基本的标准掩盖了大量的悖论。

Yet this most fundamental standard of historical periodization conceals a host of paradoxes.

youdao

在农业方面尤其如此；农业的可持续发展往往被视为进步的唯一衡量标准，而没有从历史和文化角度加以适当的评价。

This is especially true in agriculture, where sustainable development is often taken as the sole measure of progress without a proper appreciation of historical and cultural perspectives.

youdao

In other words, doesn't historicism open the canon and indeed make the process of reading, the experience of reading, archival and omnivorous rather than canonical?

换言之，难道不是历史相对论破坏了标准,甚至让阅读的过程，阅读的经历，变得如档案般无所不包，而不是遵守规范？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选