今年夏天，美国第一个做此手术实验治疗的医院在泌尿学期刊上发表了含混不清的报导。有两篇社论称那只是试验性的。
This summer, the first us trial of the treatment reported ambiguous results in the journal of Urology4, and two journal editorials said it should be considered experimental4.
这些令人担心的结果引发了近期《英国医学期刊》上的一篇社论和一个长期的“快速应答”讨论，内容关于检测、常态、不适当的医学处理方法和疾病散布。
These worrying results inspired a recent British Medical Journal editorial (2), and a long "rapid response" discussion. It is about screening, normality, undue medicalisation and disease mongering.
应用推荐