这个练习的全部意义就在于,卡罗尔这首诗诗节的结构就是在告诉学生们,要写出一个有意义的句子,他们必须注意其结构。
The point of it all says Fish is that the structure of Carroll's stanza provides all the clues they need to design a sentence that makes sense.
编写极度琐碎的单元测试可以先把结构准备就绪,然后才需要开始通过所有有意义的方法考虑问题域。
Writing insanely trivial unit tests allows you to get the structure in place before you need to start thinking about the problem domain in any significant way.
按照反映应用的架构来构建组织结构是有意义的,而按据职能领域没有意义。
It makes sense to structure the organization to reflect the architecture of the application, rather than the functional areas.
What's the point? Again, you can have things that are syntactically legal but not semantically meaningful, and static semantics is going to be a way of helping us decide what expressions, what pieces of code, actually have real meaning to it. All right?
重点是什么?重申,你可以有东西在语义结构的逻辑上有意义,但是在语义上无意义,而static语义,将是一个帮助我们,决定哪些表达,哪部分的代码实际上,有意义的途径,好么?
应用推荐