...,当代语言哲学有两种代表性观点: 一为由弗雷格、罗素提出,后由维特根斯坦、塞尔等补充 的“描述理论”(Description Theory);一为由克里普克、普南 特、唐纳兰等人所主张的“历史的因果指称理论”。
基于30个网页-相关网页
因此?抽象的不同层次可能描述理论的概念。
Thus, different levels of abstraction may characterize the concept of theory.
指称在因果描述理论和直接指称的因果链条中是同样模糊的。
This suggest indirectly that reference of proper names in the causal description theory and the casual chain of direct reference are equally vague.
现代逻辑产生以来,名称问题上的学术论争集中在描述理论和因果理论之间。
Disputes about names since modern logic are between Descriptivist theory of names and Causal theory of names.
So, people in the chemistry community and in the physics community had this general feeling that the theoretical structure of the entire universe was pretty well understood.
在化学界和物理学界,人们都觉得描述,整个宇宙的理论框架,已经被很好的理解了。
And if that's right,shouldn't we say-- Remember,the best form of the body view, I argued previously,was the brain version.
如果那是正确的,我们是不是该说…,别忘了,肉体理论的最佳描述,如我之前主张的,就是大脑理论。
So, we can think about now how do we describe this bond in valence bond theory.
我们现在可以考虑,怎么在价电子成键理论中描述这个键。
应用推荐