我怀疑这种声明的可信性,但相信它花费了xml社区的很多精力,让该社区成员致力于不会有结果的数据类型妄想。
I happen to think this claim is somewhat dubious, and I believe that it has siphoned much energy from the XML community towards a fruitless obsession with data types.
我们相信会有圆满的结果。
参与其中的人们认为它是一场噩梦,但我确信它会有满意的结果。
People involved in it think it's a nightmare, but I'm sure it will work itself out.
It turns out, and we're going to get the idea of shielding, so it's not going to actually +18 feel that full plus 18, but it'll feel a whole lot more than it will just feel in terms of a hydrogen atom where we only have a nuclear charge of one.
结果是我们会有,屏蔽的想法,所以它不会是完整的,但是它会比原子核电荷量,吸引力要大很多,只有1的氢原子的。
There's nothing profound about this, other than the understanding that the details of how you set these things up can matter a lot.
只是说我们要理解,一开始设定时候的值,会对结果有很大影响。
This is a debate that will forever and forever be fruitless because it's unanswerable.
此争论永不会有结果,因为它是不可解答的。
应用推荐