其他一些的经济干预措施也不太明智。
实施通货膨胀政策并不单纯是因为其自身的缘故,而且它同样也是其他经济干预政策所带来的一个不可避免的结果。
This is not only a policy imposed for its own sake, but an inevitable result of most of the other interventionist policies.
自由市场经济主义者会辩论说,政府不需要过度干预货币和利率过程。
Free-marketeers would argue that governments do not need to intervene in the currency and interest rate process unduly.
If it's more affordable of course you'd want to use an economic intervention.
如果是因为价格便宜,你可能会想到通过经济干预来解决
And now maybe...now I've just heard that maybe one of those two recessions wasn't even a classic recession at all So the question is 1890 to 1945 on the one hand, 1983 to the present on the other, does that tell us that ? we've gotten better at government interventions?
那么现在也许。。。就你们刚才所说,其中一次所谓的衰退也许,根本不能算是典型的经济衰退了,那么问题在于,从1890年到1945年,以及1983年至今的经济状况,是否说明,政府对经济的干预是有利的?
the economy begins to recover, and then Hoover and the Congress decided what to do to fix things and they immediately make things worse, and Franklin Roosevelt comes in and keeps fixing it and keeps fixing it and keeps fixing it and the thing is bad bad bad.
经济开始复苏,然而胡佛和国会,却决定开始干预,并且他们一出手就把事情弄得很糟,然后富兰克林上任,不断再修理,不断修理不断修理,情况还是很糟糕很糟糕。
应用推荐