The programmed working voltage of capture control DDD pacemaker is significantly lower than that of the common DDD pacemaker.
夺获控制型双腔起搏器的常规工作电压明显低于普通双腔起搏器。
Objective To investigate the optimal AV delay by means of evaluation of the hemodynamics at different AV delay in patients with a DDD pacemaker implanted.
目的对不同房室延迟DDD起搏患者进行血流动力学评价，探讨DDD起搏最佳房室延迟的设置方法。
Conclusions Anti-atrial fibrillation pacemaker in the treatment of PAF is superior than conventional DDD pacing and may be important complementation of traditional methods .
结论抗房颤起搏器治疗阵发房颤优于普通DDD起搏器，似可作为传统治疗方法的重要补充。
应用推荐