The two procedures are compared at individual′s repetitivity, juror′s consistency, and correlation to results acquired by pair comparison method and by calculation with mathematical model.
分析比较了两种语义细分法在评价者的个体重复性、团组一致性以及与成对比较法和计算结果的相关性。
Our results have been compared with the results obtained by digital method, and the discussion of the comparison is given.
将我们所得的结果与电子计算机得到的结果进行了比较和讨论。
The comparison results show that, compared with multi-dimensional separable FFT, the DIF multi-dimensional vector radix FFT algorithm has lower calculation load.
计算量比较结果显示,频域抽取多维向量基FFT算法比多维分离式FFT算法计算量低。
应用推荐