The brothers face five charges of engaging in a commercial practice which is a misleading actionand three charges of engaging in a commercial practice which is a misleading omission.
The two other stop-and-frisk-related cases in front of Judge Scheindlin are a lawsuit over trespassing in public housing projects and a class-action suit challenging the constitutionality of the broader stop-and-frisk practice, which is slated to go to trial in March.