So, in general, there is some support, at least at a very broad level, for the claim that language is in some sense part of human nature.
总的来说,语言在某种意义上,是人类本性一部分的这个观点,至少在一般性水平上,得到了一些支持
Fund managers could thus claim that a positive return was down to their own brilliance, rather than a general rise of the market, and clients could not tell the difference.
于是基金经理们可以宣称投资收益是来自于他们的智慧,而非源自整个大盘的上升,他们的客户也没法区分这两者的区别。
Let's see. The first and the second claims, I don't really need to justify because the first one is just stating some general principle, but I am not making a precise mathematical claim.
来看一下,第一个和第二个说明,我并不需要证明,因为第一个叙述的是一般原理,但我没有给出一个严格的数学证明。
So if we start actually pushing ourselves to think about examples-- does it really take one to know one--the answer is, at least as a general claim, it's not true.
所以假如我们开始,深入探讨一些例子,到底需不需要同类才能互知 答案是,至少通常来说,这是不需要的
So, in general, there is some support, at least at a very broad level, for the claim that language is in some sense part of human nature.
总的来说,语言在某种意义上,是人类本性一部分的这个观点,至少在一般性水平上,得到了一些支持
应用推荐