进行大规模的市场调查,并从许多人身上获得数据不是更保险吗?
Isn't large scale market research safer getting data on a lot of people?
最近,研究人员通过监测表面水温获得数据,并用此数据来提升珊瑚礁从漂白状态中恢复的能力。
Recently, researchers have used data collected by monitoring surface water temperatures to improve the ability of a reef to recover from bleaching.
一些心理学杂志已经创建了激励机制来提高人们对可复制科学的兴趣——例如,在明确说明可以在哪里获得数据的文章上附上“开放数据”的标签。
A few psychology journals have created incentives to increase interest in reproducible science—for example, by affixing an 'open-data' badge to articles that clearly state where data are available.
For example, one of the statistics when I talk to people about the youth online with the study that was done years ago, where they said 1/4 teenager girls had received unwelcome sexual advances on the Internet.
例如,我通过与人们交谈获得一个数据,是关于年轻人上网的一项研究,这一研究是很多年前进行的,研究显示他们称有1/4的十几岁的女孩子,在网络上受到不受欢迎的性挑逗。
This is why he gets the Nobel prize and Lewis did not get the Nobel prize, but Pauling's work was quantitative.
这是为什么他荣获了诺贝尔奖,而Lewis没获得,鲍林的工作是数据性的,是量化的。
The other big piece of available data we have is of course, the program text.
我们可以获得的另外一些数据就是,程序的文本,当你研究程序文本的时候。
应用推荐