形式平等（formal equality）与实质平等（substantive equality）在这个议题的解读与评 价上，产生相当大的差异。
基于36个网页-相关网页
只有当不同的个人或群体的份额以实质平等（material equality）的方式取决于人之刻意决策的情势成了一种必要条件的时候，实质平等这个假设才会成为一个自然而然的出发点。
基于20个网页-相关网页
... hazard inherent in substance 物质本身的危险 equality in substance 实质上的平等 ; 实质平等 accretionreduction in substance 渐增物质减少 ...
基于6个网页-相关网页
While substantive equality claims we should take different measures according to the different properties,in other words,it admits reasonable differences substantively.
实质平等主张根据不同属性采取不同对待,实质是承认合理差别。
参考来源 - 和谐社会主题下的平等制度完善Second, pursuing the substantial equality in order to push laws to make laws more justice and objective, as well as to abundantly reflect women’s demands.
其次， 应当追求实质平等，使法律走向公正和绷，充撇映妇女的需求。
参考来源 - 妇女人权的国际保护·2,447,543篇论文数据，部分数据来源于NoteExpress
罗尔斯的平等观是形式平等与实质平等的统一。
The equality concept of Rawls is the unity of formal equality and essential equality.
最后论述了实质平等与形式平等对我们的启示。
At last, the author will reveal the enlightenment of the substantive equality and formal equality.
本文对机会平等和实质平等的区分进行了讨论。
This article addresses the distinction between equality of opportunity and equality of result.
应用推荐