这一思想对于——犯罪是由“坏人”干的这一道德解释表示怀疑。
It calls into question the moral explanation that crime is done by "bad people".
庄子把道德解释成自然而然的东西,并由此出发希望从根源上去除人类之恶,重建道德基础。
Tzu considers that morality is spontaneous. In this sense, he hopes to get rid of human's evils back to root, and re-establish moral base.
然而这一道德解释是易于接受达尔文学说的一个分析的,即进化或许解释了为何某些行为被认为是应受到惩罚的。
Yet that explanation is itself susceptible to Darwinian analysis: evolution probably explains why certain behaviours are deemed worthy of punishment.
And this Robber's Cave study serves as a nice illustration of morality in everyday life.
这个罗伯洞穴实验就很好地解释了,日常生活中的道德。
Now, is there someone who can explain, those of you who are tempted by consent, can you explain why consent makes such a moral difference?
认为派克同意就属正当的,有没人能解释一下,为什么派克同意了,在道德上就有所不同呢?
应用推荐