我愿意打赌，更可能的情况是对距离或时间的测量中有一点细微的疏忽，而不是两者的比值(即推断所得的中微子速度)超过了爱因斯坦给出的速度上限。

I would bet that a subtle error in the measured distance or time is more likely than that their ratio - the inferred speed - exceeds Einstein's speed limit.

youdao

It says that function, f of x, is bounded above here's an upper limit on it, that this grows no faster than quadratic in n, n squared.

这意味着这个方法f是有上限的,这个方法增长的速度,不会比括号内的n*n快。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选