毫不奇怪地是,对创建内容的不正确的假设通常会导致错误的解决方案——特别是当相关的人甚至不讲同一种语言时。
It's no surprise that incorrect assumptions about what is to be built often leads to the wrong solution — especially when the people involved may not even speak the same language.
从评论中,它看起来就像第一个修订我的问题是模糊的大多数用户,可能使用一个不正确的语言是我的过错。
PS: from the comments, it looks like the first revision of my question was obscure to most of the users, probably my fault for using an incorrect language.
语用失误是指在运用外语进行交流时,由于做出不正确的语言行为或违反了说话规则所产生的错误,是语用层面上的错误。
Pragmatic errors refers to the use of language to communicate, because of making inappropriate language behavior or violation of the speech rules, which is a pragmatic level error.
In other words, a connotation is valuable and ought to be invoked even if it's philologically incorrect if it contributes to the unity, the complex building up of the unity, of the literary text.
也就是说,如果隐含意义是文本更具有一致性,它就是有价值,且值得探究的,即使从语言学角度说,它是不正确的。
Pseudo code. Now, you're all linguistic majors, pseudo means false, this sounds like code that ain't going to run, and that's not the intent of the term. When I say pseudo code, what I mean is, I'm going to write a description of the steps, but not in a particular programming language.
伪代码,基于你们都是学语言的,伪代码意味着不正确,这听起来就像是没法运行的代码,这可不是我们学这个的目的,当我说到伪代码的时候,我的意思是要对步骤进行一个描述,而不是某种特定的编程语言。
应用推荐