我认为弥尔顿鼓励我们去质疑，去与神学上的确定性搏斗，而这正是这首诗的其余部分所努力建立的。

I think Milton is encouraging us to question, to wrestle with the theological certainties that the rest of the poem labors to establish.

youdao

他们正争论神学上的问题。

They are debating a theological argument.

youdao

我的目的不是想要争辩，这些神学上的可能，花时间来从哲学上解释，我们如何弄清这些道理。

I'm not — it's not my goal here to argue for or against these theological possibilities, having at least taken the time to explain philosophically how we could make sense of them.

youdao

Both Hartman and Fish argued that the rhetorical strategies of Milton's similes work to reinforce the theological categories of good and evil.

哈特曼和费什都论述到这里修辞上的策略,起到了加强,善与恶在神学层面上的区分。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

Let's take the first thing first, the radical theology. I'm only able to talk about a small component of Milton's theological daring here.

先来谈激进的神学观点，在这里我只能,谈及弥尔顿神学上的大胆突破的一个小小的组成部分。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

I think Milton is encouraging us in these similes to question, really to wrestle with, the theological certainties that the rest of the poem labors to establish.

我想弥尔顿是通过这些比喻来激励我们提出疑问，更多的也在和神学上的确定性相互角力,这是剩下的部分着重要表达的。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选