这部电影触及了这些问题,但很肤浅。
也许我不该问这个问题,但是如果 Painlevé 的电影那么特别,那么好,为什么我们从来没听说过呢?
Maybe I shouldn't be asking this, but if Painlevé's films are so special, so good, why haven't we ever heard of them?
例如,只有3.4%的电影导演是女性,且只有7%的电影演员对种族和民族问题保持中立,并反映了这个国家的多样性。
For example, just 3.4 percent of film directors were female, and only 7 percent of films had a cast whose balance of race and ethnicity reflected the country's diversity.
And so, it's a very interesting play about the morality of developing nuclear weapons.
这是一部非常有意思的电影,讲的是不断发展的核武器的道德问题。
but though there were also chapters that analyze films to be count as being a form of films studies, too but the first chapter is concerned about the whole question about form and content technique and meaning.
虽然也有章节,是分析电影的,所以这本书也算讨论了电影,但是第一章讲的是,关于内容和形式的问题,关于技术和意义的问题。
Welles said, forgive me for repeating myself from a previous class, Welles said the problem with Citizen Kane is that it just look like a young film maker trying to set proof to the world that he can make movies. That's exactly what it was.
请原谅我,又要重复上次课上的话,威尔斯说,《公民凯恩》的问题在于,它看起来就像是一个年轻的电影制作人,试图去向世界证明,他能够做电影,的确是这样。
应用推荐