当葛达玛说到间隙时是那个意思,还是仅仅认为它是需要跨越的一个深渊或者一段距离,我不能确定。
Whether Gadamer means that when he speaks of gap or whether he simply means an abyss or a distance to be crossed I couldn't say.
我们曾经遇到过,但是有个微小的区别,因为海德格尔和葛达玛将客体当作是一个标准,来衡量人们对它的意见。
We've seen this before, but there is a slight difference because Heidegger and Gadamer hold out the object as a standard against which one's opinions about it can be tested.
如果是这样的话,我认为大家在葛达玛对,读者理解能力的保守主义论中,能找到一个漏洞。
Now if this is the case, it seems to me that one has found a loophole in Gadamer's conservatism about what the reader can do.
As I say, it's a wonderful irony that this particular difficulty in reading is precisely what Gadamer calls being pulled up short.
如我所说,这是个有趣的讽刺,这个阅读中特别的困难,正是葛达玛说的因某事“突然停住“
We can say that Iser's position is a reconstruction of what Gadamer has, essentially, to say about the merger of horizons.
我们可以说,伊瑟尔的观点,本质上是葛达玛观点的改写,比如说视域的融合。
Hirsch was engaged in lifelong disagreement with Gadamer but he was a student of Wimsatt, the author of "The Intentional Fallacy."
赫施一生都不同意葛达玛的观点,但他是温姆斯特的学生,温姆斯特是《意图谬论》的作者之一“
应用推荐