构成要件符合性，在日本、台湾又被称为“构成要件的该当性”。在我国刑法学界，马克昌教授认为“该当性”之称谓不宜为一般人所接受，将其转译为“符合性”，以便理解。
在实质违法性领域内争论的功能是为符合构成要件行为的正当化提供解释依据。
The function of debate in the field of substantive wrongfulness is providing the base of explaining justification of action that keeps with constitutive elements of crime.
符合构成要件的行为，在通常情况下具有违法性。
The act according with constitutive requirements has illegality under common circumstance.
日本刑法中的包括一罪，通常是指对本已符合数个构成要件的数个行为，包括评价为一次性符合构成要件的情形。
Inclusive offence in Japanese criminal law usually refers to such a case, in which multiple offences according with multiple constitutive elements of crime are evaluated one offence.
应用推荐