根据批评家所言，事实知识唯独在课堂中缺席，而课程中源本批判考试所涉及的事实知识则几无价值。

According to the critics, facts have all but disappeared from the classroom, and the inclusion in the curriculum of exercises in source-criticism are useless.

youdao

在一定程度上，这是正确的，但不存在限制这一观点引发的问题是，它避免了批评，因为每个批判都是黏上“限制”标签的。

Which is true, to a certain extent. But the problem with the no limit perspective is that it avoids criticism because every critique is labeled as a "limitation."

youdao

最近，我在收到一些批判性邮件和评价之后，主导了一个“询问读者”的栏目向读者征集改善的建议。我回复其中一个批评者说“谢谢”且请他在“询问读者”栏目里留言。

Recently, I ran an "ask the Readers" post asking for Suggestions for improvement, after receiving a few critical emails and comments.

youdao

Now I raise the matter of Satan's critique of God's power because the evaluation and the criticism of Milton, and especially of Milton's poetry, has hinged for a couple of centuries now on a related set of questions about this poet's power.

我提出撒旦批评上帝力量的问题,因为对弥尔顿的评价和批判，尤其是对他的诗的评判，几世纪以来,一直与一些与他的力量相关的问题纠结在一起。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

Obviously Tony the Tow Truck points a moral and so would be subject - to a kind of devaluation on those grounds by the New Criticism-- even though there are ways of reading Tony, as I've been suggesting, New Critic-ally.

显然《搬运车托尼》提供了一个道德的标准,新批评派对其,不会有很好的评价-,虽然，我也说过，从新批判派的角度阅读《搬运车托尼》

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选