我们曾经遇到过,但是有个微小的区别,因为海德格尔和葛达玛将客体当作是一个标准,来衡量人们对它的意见。
We've seen this before, but there is a slight difference because Heidegger and Gadamer hold out the object as a standard against which one's opinions about it can be tested.
去年,在记者哈拉·贾伯面前,伊斯·玛尔对萨达的描述是:虔诚。
Last year, Ismail described Sadah to journalist Hala Jaber as pious.
之后,萨奥尔一行将前往距海利根达姆45公里的维斯玛,来自八国的74位青年代表将在此讨论目前世界所面临的主要问题,与主会场遥相呼应。
Later the group will go to Wismar, about 45 kilometers from Heiligendamm, where 74 youths from the G8 countries are debating the main problems facing the world, in parallel to the main summit.
We can say that Iser's position is a reconstruction of what Gadamer has, essentially, to say about the merger of horizons.
我们可以说,伊瑟尔的观点,本质上是葛达玛观点的改写,比如说视域的融合。
As you'll see when we return to Iser after I've said a few things about Hirsch, this, as you'll see, is the fundamental difference between Gadamer and Iser.
正如你们所看到的,当我谈论了赫施的问题之后,又回到了伊瑟尔,这就是葛达玛和伊瑟尔的明显不同。
You can figure Milton asking in this poem Lycidas if it's true: is it true what the Elder Brother said, ? that virtue is always rewarded and evil punished?
可以看出在《利西达斯》中弥尔顿是在问:,《科玛斯》中哥哥所说的,善有善报恶有恶报是真的么?
应用推荐