如下是我们人性研究网站的宗旨:建立一至二个研究人类心理的概念模型,并通过若干情景实验,研究技术如何对人类心理、大脑和身体状况产生影响。
Build a conceptual model or two of the human psyche, and then experiment with a number of scenarios on how technologies might impact the basic human mind, brain, and condition.
事实上这之间还是有区别的,因为在这些实验中参与者受暗示而做出的反应在各自的情景当中都是完全合理的。
In fact there's a subtle difference because in each of the situations in these experiments the response that was primed was absolutely appropriate in each of the situations.
在第一组实验中,12名志愿者在磁场中暴露了25分钟,然后他们接受“道德迷宫”式的情景测试。
In the first experiment, 12 volunteers were exposed to the magnetic field for 25 minutes before they were given a series of 'moral maze' style scenarios.
What's really going on is you're floating in the psychologist's tank in their lab with the electrodes hooked up your brain.
真实的情景是你飘浮在,实验室里的心理学研究容器里,电极连接着你的脑袋。
And similarly, while we're at it--this is not a Matrix-like worry-- if you're worried about, yeah, but what's happening ? to world poverty while I'm doing all of this?
大家不必担心《骇克帝国》的情景-,如果你担心,当我接受实验时,国际贫困情况是否会恶化?
Now, we know from the work in the Bystander effect that in general which one are we more likely to help in, when we're the only person or multiple?
我们从旁观者效应的实验中知道,我们在哪种情景上更可能出手相救,一个人,还是有其他人时?
应用推荐