当实验者记录下游戏玩家从列表中阅读“攻击性”或“非攻击性”词汇所花的时间时，我们能确定他们实际上在测量什么吗？

And when experimenters record the time it takes game players to read "aggressive" or "non-aggressive" words from a list, can we be sure what they are actually measuring?

youdao

我们相信此定律的原因，是所有实验在测量，不确定度范围内均支持该定律。

We believe in it since it is consistent within the uncertainty of the measurements with all experiments that have been done.

youdao

因为在测量不确定度范围内的，所有实验和测量，都符合第二定律。

Because all experiments and all measurements within the uncertainty of the measurements are in agreement with the Second Law.

youdao

And again there, too, you saw an experimental result you were presented with that says, well at least to the extent that it could be measured, it was obviously getting very small.

再一次，你看到了一个,你经知道的实结果，至少在实验测量的范围内，对理想气体条件下的气体这一项很小。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

Joule actually did this experiment, and he observed that for the gas expansions that he could do, that the temperature did not increase measurably.

事实上焦耳的确做了这个实验，他做到了,他能达到的最好实验要求，发现在可测量范围内没有观察到温度上升。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

Now of course, it was a psychological experiment, they had all these different measures, taken before/after.

这是个心理学实验，在实验前后进行各种测量。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选