文章运用现代逻辑中的“可能世界”理论来分析言语交际中的“反逻辑”修辞现象。
There are much rhetoric disobeying logic in speech social intercourse. This text analyzes the phenomenon with modern logic concept of "possible world".
从而得出“反逻辑”修辞仅仅是辞面或者形式上的反逻辑,而非真正意义上的违反逻辑。
The conclusion of it is that rhetoric disobeying logic is only breaching logic formally, in fact, it doesn't disobey logic.
本文试图通过对这个命题的解读,分析霍姆斯为什么“反逻辑”,他反对的究竟是什么,他对逻辑在法律中的作用及局限性的认识。
This article attempted to offer an interpretation of the proposition to analyse why Holmes anti-logic, what he actually against, and advanced his argument on the function and limit of law.
Let me go ahead and call print F. I'm going to say A equals A and then I need a percent D, backslash, comma A; so this is a little bit of -- more syntax than would be nice, %d but I'm just saying, literally, A equals percent D, and I'm plugging in the value of A for percent D.
我们继续调用printf,我说明A等于,然后我需要%d,反斜杠n,逗号;,所以这个有点--偏向逻辑的,而不偏向美观的,但是我刚说了,字面上,A等于,我用%d插入了A的值。
应用推荐