说神学解读不同于历史解读,这是什么意思?
What does it mean to talk about a theological interpretation of text that's not the same as a historical interpretation?
你们到时会发现,我叫你们读是有更大的意图的,那就是讲解,历史解读和神学解读之间的差别。
You'll realize that that's part of a bigger project that I had, which was to address the difference between historical interpretation and theological interpretation.
他的分析植根于对法国历史带有倾向性的解读。
His analysis was rooted in a somewhat tendentious reading of French history.
And that conviction is going to color its presentation, its evaluation and its interpretation of Israel's history and her kings from Joshua right through to 2 Kings.
这一认定将会影响它的描述,它的评估和它对以色列历史的解读,以及它的国王们,从《约书亚》一直到《列王记》
I want to back up now because I think it's important to fill in a little bit of the historical context behind that long but important prose treatise.
我想要退回去往前看是因为我认为,补充一些历史背景对于,解读那篇冗长却又很关键的政论是很重要的。
It illustrates again this idea that how much of this ancient text is it important for you to know, on its own terms,in its historical context in the first century, or how is it important for you to know in the way it's been interpreted for the last 2000 years?
这又一次说明了,你对这部古代文本的了解,是对其本身100年间历史脉络的了解,还是在过去2000年间被解读的,哪个更为重要?
应用推荐