主要分歧有：CPA过失及其程度的判断标准，“相对保证”与“绝对保证”之争。
Main discrepancies lie in: the judgment standard of the fault and its seriousness of CPA, the argument about "relative assurance" and "absolute assurance".
在本案中，法院灵活运用判断过失的标准，保障了裁判的正当性和妥当性。
In this case, the court flexibility judged negligence standard, to protect the judges the legitimacy and appropriateness.
本文通过对故意的判断标准和过失的判断标准比较分析，确定了在司法实践中，客观标准说战多数地位。
Based on the criteria for determining the purpose and criteria for determining the comparative negligence analysis of established judicial practice, objective criteria that the majority of war status.
应用推荐