有任一方的开场说明揭示出实质的利益吗?
不完全满足任一方,但充分满足所有方,这样的谈判结果是可以设想的。
It's possible to imagine a negotiated outcome that satisfies no one claimant fully but all sufficiently.
你不确定该如何给第一本书分类,因此它不能算作支持科幻区或奇幻区任一方的有力证据。
You're not sure how to categorize Book 1, so it's not good evidence for either Science Fiction or Fantasy.
Would the winner of the war slaughter the enemy that would fall behind or would they give them back?
战争胜利的一方会屠杀对方落在后面的人,还是任其溃逃
应用推荐