但我们也不能说,二元论的解释更好。
But I don't think what we should say is, "the better explanation lies with the dualist."
这么看来事实上笛卡尔关于二元论的论据并不特别强而有力。
So Descartes arguments for dualism are not actually particularly strong ones.
我选取会议话题,心灵与自然,借此来回顾,尼采对二元论的攻击。
Ok, so I've taken the topics of the conference, mind and nature, as an opportunity to reflect on Nietzsche's attacks on dualism.
But dualism doesn't so much offer the explanation typically as just say, "Well, maybe we'd be better off positing something immaterial."
但是二元论还没有给出,这样的解释,也许我们假设非物质的存在会好一些
So these are the two basic positions: the dualist view on the one hand, the physicalist view on the other.
以上就是两种基本的理论,一种是二元论的观点,另一种是物理主义的观点
A lot rests on it, but as Crick points out; the scientific consensus now is that dualism is wrong.
很多人都信奉它,但正如克里克所指出的,如今的科学共识认为二元论是错误的
应用推荐