选言推理在侦查活动中具有重要的作用。
The disjunctive reasoning is an important reasoning in the process of detection of crimes.
它们由线性的因果决定和不相容选言命题的形式构成。
It is formed by linear causal model and incompatible disjunctive proposition.
THOG问题是研究不相容选言推理的一个实验范式。
The THOG problem is a paradigm to study the exclusive disjunction.
P190）这是一个否定肯定式的选言推理，清晰而严密。
This is negative-affirmative reasoning in a clear and consistent manner.
因此，以尽举选言命题作前提能构成从已知获取新知的推理。
Therefore, taking the disjunctive proposition as the prerequisite can attain the new by inferring from the known.
运用选言推理有助于判定案件的性质，缩小侦查的范围，证明侦查假设。
The application of disjunctive syllogism contributes to the judgment of the nature of a case, reduction of investigation areas, and proof of investigation suppositions.
与第一步推理一样，(二)(三)两步都是形式相同的否定肯定式的选言推理。
Like the first step of reasoning, step 2 and 3 employ the same negative-affirmative reasoning.
本文分析了排他性逻辑思维的内容，在经济活动中的表现及与排中律、选言推理的关系。
The paper analyzes the contents of exclusive logical thinking, its manifestation in economic activities, and its relationship with the law of excluded middle and disjunctive inference.
其实在自然语言中，“或者……或者”也表达不相容选言命题，可以从语义、标志等方面来进行区分。
While in natural language, "or... or..." can also expresses antipathic propositions which can be distinguished from such aspects as semanteme and symbols.
法律选言规范判断不同于传统逻辑中的选言判断，从逻辑层面上分析三种不同类型的法律选言规范判断，有助于准确地理解法律、正确地适用法律。
An analysis of three different types of the verdict of law language diction from the perspective of logic is helpful in understanding and the applying law.
法律选言规范判断不同于传统逻辑中的选言判断，从逻辑层面上分析三种不同类型的法律选言规范判断，有助于准确地理解法律、正确地适用法律。
An analysis of three different types of the verdict of law language diction from the perspective of logic is helpful in understanding and the applying law.
应用推荐