说谎者悖论是学界探索不止的千年难题。
“说谎者悖论”是诸多悖论中非常典型的一个。
“悖论”这个话题自古希腊的“说谎者悖论”至今，已有两千多年的历史了。
The topic of "paradox" has lasted for over two thousands years since the "liar paradox" in the ancient Greek.
“说谎者悖论”是诸多悖论中非常典型的一个。可从五个角度、用不同方法对这一悖论进行分析和破解。
The liar's paradox is one of the typical paradoxes. This paper intends to analyse it from five different angles and in different ways to reveal the Har s paradox.
通过对比分析奥斯汀式阐释与罗素式阐释，可以看出，说谎者悖论产生的根源是忽视了情境或情境要素参量。
By contrast analyses between Austinian Account and Russellian Account, it can be seen that the root of the liar is the negligence of the parameter of situation or situation constituent.
并从说谎者语句本身的分析指出“本语句”的指称为空集，从而提出自己的解决语义悖论的方案。
And pointed out "this sentence" refers is the null set, is insignificant, from the analysis of the liar sentence itself, thus proposes own the approach to paradox solution.
欧布里德的“说谎者”悖论和赫拉克利特的“亦此亦彼”悖论，两者携手挑战亚里士多得的“不矛盾律”。
Eubulides' the Liar Paradox and Heraclitus' This and That Paradox both challenge Aristotle's Non-contradiction Law.
欧布里德的“说谎者”悖论和赫拉克利特的“亦此亦彼”悖论，两者携手挑战亚里士多得的“不矛盾律”。
Eubulides' the Liar Paradox and Heraclitus' This and That Paradox both challenge Aristotle's Non-contradiction Law.
应用推荐