第二部分，处分原则与国家干预概述。
Part II, Outline of the principle of disposition and State intervention.
第四部分，我国民事诉讼处分原则与国家干预关系之分析。
Part iv, Studying the relationship between the principle of parties' disposition and State intervention in civil litigation of our country.
笔者认为应该采取无权处分原则上有效，同时存在一些例外来设计我国无权处分制度。
The author argues that the legislator should design the form of Unauthorized Disposition by making the Unauthorized Disposition effective in principle and the exceptions of validity.
而当事人的主体性是通过诉讼中的处分原则、辩论原则、举证责任原则等来规范和实现的。
Thus the problems of the subject feature of the clients arise, and the solution lies in such principles as disposition, debate and the evidential burden.
民事诉之撤回制度是民事诉讼中的一项重要制度，是民事处分原则和程序主体性原则的充分体现。
Lawsuit withdrawal is an important system in civil litigation, and embodies disposal principle and principle of maintaining procedural subjectivity.
但长期以来，学界对处分原则一直存在着误识。这些误识源于原苏联的民事诉讼国家干预理论和传统的审判理念。
But over a long period of time, there has been a misunderstanding of the principle of disposition in the academic circles.
国家干预是与当事人处分原则相对立的一个概念，本部分运用历史分析的方法，阐述了国家干预的历史沿革及其在我国的演变过程。
State intervention is one concept against the principle of parties' disposition. This part elaborates the history and development about State intervention in our country.
第一个实现原则是：使用策略集合在结构的入口处分别标记每个工作条目。
The first implementation principle is: Individually tag every work item, on entry to the architecture, with a policy set..
解决这一问题的出路在于，参考法律保留原则，由最高权力机关以法律的形式设定高校处分权。
The access to it is to definite college's penalty right in the form of law by supreme power.
确立区分原则是妥当处理无权处分的基础。
Forming different principle is the base of dealing with "no" right treatments property.
大陆法系保安处分在立法目的、立法原则、适用条件、适用对象、执行处遇等方面，有许多共通之处。
Security measures in the civil law have much in common in the legislative intent, legislative principles, applicable conditions, the application of object, the treatment of implementation, etc.
当合同双方预先约定了损害赔偿金或损害赔偿的计算方法，或者对实体权利行使了处分权时，可预见性原则并不适用。
When parties have agreed with liquidated damages in contract, or disposed of their substantive rights, the rule doesn't apply.
当合同双方预先约定了损害赔偿金或损害赔偿的计算方法，或者对实体权利行使了处分权时，可预见性原则并不适用。
When parties have agreed with liquidated damages in contract, or disposed of their substantive rights, the rule doesn't apply.
应用推荐