在同一程序中就同一纠纷同时提起侵权之诉和合同之诉的起诉方式（重叠合并）广受排斥，然而实体法并不能为此提供依据。
The alternative joinder that plaintiff puts forward two kinds of cause of action concerning contract and tort is extensively excluded, however, substantive law cannot provide basis for it.
存在合同关系时，通常还有责任竞合的问题，消费者可选择其一提起违约之诉或侵权之诉。
The existence of a contractual relationship companions with issues of liability cross, consumers may choose one of contact breach or tort to bring to the court.
换言之，是依合同法提起违约之诉，还是依侵权法提起侵权之诉，将产生完全不同的法律后果。
In other words, is brought under contract law, breach of the complaint, or brought under tort law tort action which will have a completely different legal consequence.
当违约行为确实导致合同相对方的非财产性损害时，可以依据责任竞合理论通过侵权之诉得到救济。
Breach of contract when the relative side did lead to non-pecuniary damages, the liability can be based on competing theories get relief through the infringement complaint.
当违约行为确实导致合同相对方的非财产性损害时，可以依据责任竞合理论通过侵权之诉得到救济。
Breach of contract when the relative side did lead to non-pecuniary damages, the liability can be based on competing theories get relief through the infringement complaint.
应用推荐