第一章是刑事证明标准的概念和功能。
The first chapter is about the concept and function of criminal proof standard.
本章在分析了我国刑事证明标准的现状及缺陷的基础上，提出了对我国刑事证明标准规则建构的建议。
This chapter analyzed the current situation and defects of criminal proof standard, then based on which proposed recommendations on reconstruction of criminal proof standard rules in our country.
我国刑事诉讼法关于证明标准的规定仍欠完善，传统的证明标准理论也存在诸多不足。论文从诉讼规律出发，结合各国相关的法律规定，探讨了我国刑事证明标准体系的完善问题。
The regulations on testification standard in China's Criminal Procedural Law is not perfect, and there are also many shortcomings in the theory of traditional standards of testification.
证明标准是逮捕条件中的核心问题，但我国的刑事诉讼法及相关司法解释均未对这一问题作出明确的界定。
Standard of testification is a core problem in arrestment conditions. However in our country's criminal procedure law and relevant judicial interpretations, this problem is not clearly defined.
证明标准问题，一直以来是刑事诉讼中的热点与难点，这方面，学界展开过激烈的争论，最后仍未达成一致的共识。
Prove standards have been the highlights and difficulties in criminal procedure theories. Academic circles have been discussing them for a long time, but no agreements have been made any more.
本章较为具体的阐释了大陆法系国家的内心确信的证明标准，以及其在德国、意大利的几种刑事简易程序中的适用情况。
This chapter interprets mainly the proof standards of innermost definition in civil law countries, and its applications in simple criminal proceedings in Germany and Italy.
刑事诉讼证明中程序证明标准是一个新概念，该概念与实体证明标准并列。
The procedural standard of proof is a new concept in the criminal procedure, and both of the procedural standard of proof and the substantive standard of proof are all important.
文章简要阐述了刑事诉讼证明标准的特征，对各种有代表性的观点进行了评析，并提出了实体真实的证明标。
By comparing and analyzing some views on this subject, author provides a new idea that substantive truth should be the standard of proof in the criminal procedure.
刑事诉讼证明标准，可分为客观证明标准和主观证明标准、多元化的证明标准和一元化的证明标准。
Proof standards in the criminal procedure can be classified into objective proof standards and subjective proof standards, diversified proof standards and centralized proof standards.
我国死刑案件证明标准目前采用和普通刑事案件相同的证明标准，这不利于被告人的生命和自由的保障。
This article first analyzes the problems of proving standard for death penalty cases and then explains the current proving standard and suggests that the standard should be enhanced.
全文分为五个部分：第一章，介绍了刑事诉讼证明标准的概念及内涵，并对其和相邻范畴之间作了比较分析。
The full text is divided into five parts. The first chapter introduces the conception and connotation of criminal procedural testification standard, and compares it with similar categories.
在刑事诉讼中，由于诉讼阶段不同，认识的层次和阶段任务有所差异，这就决定了在不同的刑事诉讼阶段应适用不同的证明标准；
Because there are different stages in the criminal procedure and each stage has its own tasks, the standard of proof should also be of vareties.
与有罪判决证明标准相比，刑事起诉标准存在两种模式，一种是二者相同模式，另一种是前者高于后者模式。
The prosecution proof standard and the prosecution standard are not the identical conception, the prosecution standard must measure the public interests and the criminal policy.
证明标准是贯穿整个证明过程始终的一根金线，是刑事诉讼的基础和核心，侦查人员必须将以证据为核心的侦查观念贯穿于整个侦查过程。
The standard of proof throughout the entire certification process is always the one golden thread, and is the basis and the core for criminal proceedings.
虽然我国刑事诉讼法明确了刑事诉讼的证明标准，但是在实践中仍存在诸多问题，不好操作。
Though has defined the identification standard of criminal suit in criminal procedure law of our country, but a great deal of problems still exist in practice, not easy to operate.
治理不当审讯，应对不同强制措施之下的审讯时空进行严格限制，降低刑事拘留、逮捕的证明标准，对侦查机关的目标考核制度进行结构性调整。
To eradicate the improper interrogation, we shall limit the conditions of the interrogation, lower the demands of arrest and detention, and systematically reform the target assessment system.
治理不当审讯，应对不同强制措施之下的审讯时空进行严格限制，降低刑事拘留、逮捕的证明标准，对侦查机关的目标考核制度进行结构性调整。
To eradicate the improper interrogation, we shall limit the conditions of the interrogation, lower the demands of arrest and detention, and systematically reform the target…
治理不当审讯，应对不同强制措施之下的审讯时空进行严格限制，降低刑事拘留、逮捕的证明标准，对侦查机关的目标考核制度进行结构性调整。
To eradicate the improper interrogation, we shall limit the conditions of the interrogation, lower the demands of arrest and detention, and systematically reform the target…
应用推荐