本发明改善了公知技术偏差显示游标移动的现象。
The invention improves the moving phenomenon of deviation display vernier in the prior art.
第二部分是公知技术抗辩原则与其他相关原则的比较。
Second, comparing the principle of the prior art and other correlative principles.
最后，笔者对我国的公知技术抗辩制度提出了自己的一些建议。
Finally, the author puts forward his own proposals to our country's prior art counterplead system.
本文论述的公知技术抗辩原则就是对专利权加以合理限制的一项重要原则。
The principle of prior art plea is an important principle to restrict the patent right reasonably.
同时根据诚信和公平原则，应适用禁止反悔和公知技术抗辩作为排除规则。
Meanwhile, in accordance with the principle of honesty and fairness, the doctrine of prosecution history estoppels and plea known technology shall be taken as the exclusion principle.
重点通过对“公知技术”这一概念的比较、分析，阐明了公知技术抗辩原则的基本内涵。
It is illustrate the basic connotation of the plea by compare and analyze the "prior art".
专利在先使用权与商标在先使用权、在先使用权抗辩与公知技术抗辩间有着密切的联系与区别。
The prior user right concerning patent and prior user right concerning brand, the answer on the prior user right concerning patent and the public known technique have close relations and differences.
本部分重点阐释了在专利侵权诉讼中与公知技术抗辩原则相近的两个法律原则——等同原则和禁止反悔原则。
This part emphasize on expatiating two close legal principle with the prior art principle in the patent tort suit-equal principle and forbidden regretted principle.
规定新颖性条件的目的，就在于防止将已经公知的技术批准为专利。
The aim of the novelty requirements is to avoid awarding patent right to public technology.
对于已经公知的技术来说，公众有自由使用的权利，任何人都无权将它纳入其专利独占权的范围之内，否则就损害了公众的利益。
To public technology, people have rights to use them freely, so they are not in the range of patent monopoly, otherwise it will do harm to public.
对于已经公知的技术来说，公众有自由使用的权利，任何人都无权将它纳入其专利独占权的范围之内，否则就损害了公众的利益。
To public technology, people have rights to use them freely, so they are not in the range of patent monopoly, otherwise it will do harm to public.
应用推荐