休谟问题是逻辑哲学上的一大难题。
Humes problem is a quite difficult one in the history of philosophy of logic.
“休谟问题”的提出对后世影响重大。
The raising of Hume's Problem has exerted an immeasurable influence on later philosophy.
赖欣巴哈在对休谟问题的辩护中存在的困难；
The difficult in Reichenbach's justification for Hume problem.
背景之二是为解决休谟问题而出现的局部归纳逻辑。
The other background is the logic of local induction, which came forth for the solution of the Hume problem.
休谟问题一直悬而来决，是否是由于问题前提的原因？
Hume's problem was still unsolved. Is it because of the premise of the problem?
在近代认识史上，休谟问题是向人类理性提出的最大挑战。
The Hume's question is the greatest challenge to the human rationality in the modern cognition history.
休谟问题是一组与因果性有关的问题，而归纳问题是派生的。
Hume problems are a series of questions concerning causation. and inductive problem is merely a derived problem from them.
归纳推理的合理性问题最早由体谟提出，故又称“休谟问题”。
The issue of the rationality of inductive inference was first raised by David Hume, so it is also called "Humes problem".
波普尔认为证伪原则不仅解决了休谟问题，而且也解决了康德问题。
Karl Popper considered that the falsification principle has solved the David Hume's problem as well as Kant's problem.
波普尔把休谟问题界定为：归纳逻辑是否得到证明，或者在什么条件下得到证明的问题。
Popper defined Hume problems as that whether the inductive logic can be verified or on what conditions can it be verified.
从现代逻辑和语言哲学看，休谟问题是可消解的，而科学实在论正是在科学现实基础上得以成立。
From the view of modern logic and philosophy of language, the Hume's problem can be eliminated, and scientific realism can be established in the realities of science.
罗素为解决休谟问题而提出归纳原则。金岳霖等人力图证明归纳原则是永真命题，但未对可能命题作出语义解释。
Other philosopher such as Jin Yulun tried hard to confirm that inductive principle was a tautology proposition, but didn't give semantic interpretation for possible proposition.
本文重读休谟的问题，回击一种对休谟问题的曲解，并借用可能世界的逻辑分析方法，重新对人类知识的确定性进行探讨，展现出奎因采取整体论的意义检验理论的深层原因。
Restating Hume's problem, correcting an misunderstandable opinion to Hume's problem, taking advantage of the method of possible worlds to discuss what human's knowledge means and why Quin…
事实上，如果你采纳休谟关于因果关系的观点，那么对于笛卡尔来说便是一个非常严肃的问题了，实际上我们并没有采纳。
Actually if you take a Humean view of causation what looks like a really serious problem for Descartes actually goes away.
这么一来关于归纳法的论断，以休谟的思考方式来看的话,并不会产生怀疑论问题。
So the claim is that induction, no skeptical problem can be raised about induction in the way that Hume was thought to do.
基于那样的背景，让我们重新回到休谟的问题上来。
Okay, with that background let's go back to Hume's question.
休谟在理解一般科学是如何运作的问题上承袭了这个模式。
So that is taken by Hume to be a model for how science in general can operate.
还有最后几张幻灯片我很快地总结下，很多人尝试以不同的方式来回答休谟的问题。
Ok, the last few slides I am just going to summarize very quickly, many people have attempted to answer Hume and all sorts of different ways.
“那是休谟的思想，”回答是，“而休谟的思想正和你的思想相同——只有一点不同：他很聪明，承认了贝克莱的问题无法回答。”
"In his, Hume's, mind," was the reply. "And Hume's mind was the same as yours, with this difference: he was wise enough to admit there was no answering Berkeley."
休谟的问题不能从逻辑上得剑根本的解决，其原因在于人类思维领域的限制。
Hume's problem can't be resolved completely in a logical way due to the restriction of human thoughts.
“归纳问题”自休谟提出以来一直未能得到满意的解决。
There has been no satisfactory resolution to Hume's "induction problem" since he put it forward.
当代概率归纳逻辑的一个重要学派即主观主义或私人主义对待休谟问亦即归纳合理性问题的态度，密切地依赖于他们提出的大弃赌定理。
The solution of Hume's problem by the subjective or personalistic theory of probability induction relies heavily on Dutch Book theorem, which is divided into two parts, static and dynamic.
自休谟以来，归纳问题一直是困扰西方经验主义科学家和哲学家的难题。
Since Hume, the problem of induction had been a puzzle that baffled western empiricist scientists and philosophers.
波普尔解决休谟归纳问题了吗？
在当代科学哲学中，科学合理性问题如同休谟归纳问题一样，是一个让哲学家寝食难安的问题。
As the issue presented by Hume, scientific rationality is a puzzle for philosophers in modern philosophy of science.
休谟对归纳推理的合理性提出的质疑，一直引起人们对此问题的兴趣。
The questions that Hume raised on the reasonability of induction have aroused the interest of many researchers.
休谟的因果问题直接引发了康德的哲学思考，被改造、转换为康德问题。
Hume Question arose Kants thinking directly, and is transformed into the Kant Question.
这便是休谟在美感根源问题上的基本观念。
All these are Hume's basic concept of root of aesthetic feeling.
归纳合理性问题最初是由休谟提出的。
The issue of the rationality of inductive inference was raised by David Hume at first.
自休谟以来 ，归纳问题一直是困扰西方经验主义科学家和哲学家的难题。
The problem of demarcation is of demarcation for science; the problem of induction is of correctness of induction.
应用推荐