你也不过是事后诸葛亮，干吗批评人家？
Why criticize other people when you once knew no better yourself?
现在变成事后诸葛亮，多少有些遗憾。
事后聪明不难；作事后诸葛亮容易。
他是事后诸葛亮。
我发现了这些信息的数据库，尽管这有点事后诸葛亮。
I found all these databases of this information, although this was after the fact.
事后诸葛亮好当。
我明白你的意思，但你不觉得这已是“事后诸葛亮”了吗？
I see your point, but don't you think it's way after the fact.
如果说他们觉得需要一场演习,我不觉得我们应该做事后诸葛亮.
If they feel like they need a training exercise, I am not sure we are to second guess.
这似乎有点事后诸葛亮，但试问自己，多少你分享的创作没有了下文。
This seems obvious in hindsight, but ask yourself how many of your ideas you’ve “shared” on Twitter that never went any further.
事后诸葛亮，决策者的错误的信任，他们能精确的推出预言和事后的结果的。
The hindsight bias is the tendency for decision makers to falsely believe that they would have accurately predicted the outcome of an vent once that outcome is actually know.
Conley说，比如，人们很容易成为事后诸葛亮，对偏好提出进化论解释。
For instance, it's easy to come up with evolutionary explanations for our preferences after the fact, Conley said.
由于做事后诸葛亮好处多多，专栏作家们将会评估本次世界杯之旅有多么成功。
With the benefit of hindsight, the columnists will make assessments on how successful the tournament has been.
作品的修改不仅仅是在初稿完成后留出尽可能多的时间来进行事后诸葛亮的事。
Revision is not just an afterthought that gets only as much time as you have at the end of an assignment.
即使他们做对了，事故也会时有发生，而事后诸葛亮的评论人士，会将他们批驳得体无完肤。
Even if they get it right, accidents will happen occasionally and commentators, with the benefit of hindsight, will hang them out to dry.
不仅如此，这还会导致标准成为事后诸葛亮——想解决问题时(例如奇数的版本号)却发现已经太迟了。
Not only that, but the standard was an after-the-fact write-up, which meant that by the time it came to fix problems (such as odd version Numbers) it was already too late.
如果您处于食物链的最底层，就只能是事后诸葛亮，情况就太糟糕了，因为这样会使组织的敏捷性大打折扣。
If you're at the bottom of the food chain, you're an afterthought-and that's too bad, because it makes your organization far less agile than it could be.
从事后诸葛亮的角度来看，他犯了一个错误，但是为什么不提其他几百件赫卡比先生也同样显示慈悲的案子呢？
With hindsight, he made a mistake, but what of the hundreds of other cases where he showed mercy?
就像所有事后诸葛亮般宣称此次全球金融危机不可避免的金融专家一样，我们的错误现在看来十分清楚。
Like all those financial experts who in hindsight see the global financial crisis as inevitable, our errors now look crystal clear.
错误消息框的一个问题在于它经常是事后诸葛亮，它显示：“坏事发生了，你所能做的就是承认灾难的降临。”
One of the problems with error messages is that they are usually ex post facto reports of failure. They say, "Bad things just happened, and all you can do is acknowledge the catastrophe."
最后，事后诸葛亮是指决策者相信他们一定掌握了某事的基本情况，他们就能精确的预算出这件事的结果的趋向。
Finally, the hindsight bias is the tendency for decision makers to falsely believe that they would have accurately predicted the outcome of an event once that outcome is actually known.
在你有负罪感之前，还是了解一下大吃大喝后哪些过分严格的控制行为可不可取，这些只不过是事后诸葛亮，毫无用处。
Before you start feeling guilty, know that taking a too-strict approach after a binge will most certainly backfire.
因此，在这个问题上我没觉得两位候选人有多大不同，尽管现在克里说，如果是他就会以不同的方式来做，事后诸葛亮真了不起啊！
Thus I don't find much difference between the two candidates on this issue, even if Kerry now says he would have done it differently. Isn't hindsight a wonderful thing!
在[color=#ff0000]盟军的“德累斯顿大轰炸”事件上，又有事后诸葛亮认为此次轰炸犯了战争罪，而他便组织了大量的史实和论据来驳斥这种说法。
On the allied bombing of Dresden he assembles a formidable array of facts and arguments against the post-war second-guessers who see it as a war crime.
在[color=#ff0000]盟军的“德累斯顿大轰炸”事件上，又有事后诸葛亮认为此次轰炸犯了战争罪，而他便组织了大量的史实和论据来驳斥这种说法。
On the allied bombing of Dresden he assembles a formidable array of facts and arguments against the post-war second-guessers who see it as a war crime.
应用推荐